inefficiently as well, but we've got no api yet, so it's probably ok. maybe per-date would be a nice compromise? but that would potentially mean lots of requests for going back through time, so an api would be nicer. it could even work with daily files, reading them into memory (potential oops) and then serving ranges of dates. hm...
|
|
||
| 14 |
|
14 |
|
| 15 |
|
15 |
|
| 16 |
|
16 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
| 17 |
|
19 |
|
| 18 |
|
20 |
|
| 19 |
|
21 |
|
|
|
||
| 30 |
|
32 |
|
| 31 |
|
33 |
|
| 32 |
|
34 |
|
| 33 |
|
|
|
| 34 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
| 35 |
|
36 |
|
| 36 |
|
37 |
|
| 37 |
|
38 |
|
|
|
||
| 41 |
|
42 |
|
| 42 |
|
43 |
|
| 43 |
|
44 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
| 44 |
|
50 |
|
| 45 |
|
51 |
|
| 46 |
|
52 |
|
|
|
||
| 49 |
|
55 |
|
| 50 |
|
56 |
|
| 51 |
|
57 |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
| 52 |
|
72 |
|
| 53 |
|
73 |
|
| 54 |
|
74 |
|